Mr Hacking,
This is the third open letter we have written to you.
After nearly one week, you have still chosen to not respond to Paul S Waugh’s open invitation to a live debate. Despite your non-response, we maintain this invitation. More importantly, we maintain our appeal to you to repent in Christ.
This letter explains for the sake of correcting the record publicly, why Lighthouse Global ceased contact with you, corrects a false impression you published, and warns others in the Body of Christ about the destructive pattern we call the Judas Syndrome.
In this letter:
We are writing this third letter to make clear that the person who pays the biggest price in the Judas Syndrome, is the Judas themselves. In this case, that is you and tragically, your family.
We are also writing to educate our brothers and sisters in Christ about threats that can exist among them—individuals who claim Christ, but are deep down loyal and allied to the Establishment of this world.
The Judas Syndrome did not terminate at the end of a rope in Hakeldama, the Field of Blood.
That was just the beginning of it.
It is far more pernicious and undetected today.
And this syndromic trend often takes form where so-called journalists will write about the Body of Christ, putting their content entirely before the Christian. They prioritise their content ahead of Christ and ahead of the individuals they are writing about.
This includes journalists who feign Christianity, who are not Christian in truth, but are positioned to deliberately make the Body of Christ look bad.
This is a growing trend and precisely why we write these letters and articles, to expose this syndromic trend to our true blue brothers and sisters in Christ.
1. We Tried To Stop You From Sabotaging Yourself and Your Family
We tried everything to warn you of what you were doing.
We tried to stop you from making shocking and abhorrent mistakes.
Paul S Waugh personally went to great pains to warn you that investigating Lighthouse required the highest levels of character and journalistic competence.
As you will read below, Sukh Singh warned you of the self-destructive path you were going down, including a formal cease and desist letter.
You didn’t listen.
You refused to listen.
You have now chosen to publish an article (and signal further articles) full of mistakes, errors, falsehoods, misinformation, disinformation, and deceptive statements.
We believe you have also brought your own father into this mess in the public domain, at a time when he has lost his Heritage Lordship in the House of Lords, and you have a young family to support.
2. The Awful Price You Are Paying For Your Toxic Pride and Stupidity
What you have done by publishing this recent article despite the countless warnings and cautions from us, is shocking.
You have exposed (in our experience of you):
- A public profession of Christianity without evidence of Christian self-sacrificing love
- Journalistic incompetence: basic inaccuracy, careless errors, and ideological bias
- A very concerning and unhealthy relationship with your father Lord David Hacking
- Praise and adoration for the BBC, an organisation notorious for abusing children, deceiving the public, and enforcing a tax on citizens with fear of criminal conviction
- Your own family for having roots in the Masonic cult
What else are we about to unearth, that we have not yet discovered?
What more damage are you going to cause through your foolishness and rank stupidity?
3. The Personal Pain of Holding You Accountable to The Truth
Everyone at Lighthouse is in shock of what we have unearthed.
We’re in shock that we even have to do this.
None of us want to be doing this.
Paul tried to connect with you and support you as a fellow Christian brother in need.
Kris, Jatinder and Sukh, the defendants in the court trial, took you to be an ally.
We wanted to believe you were a brother in the faith, fighting for the faith, and championing the brotherhood and sisterhood for the sake of Christ.
We grieve over you—over your militant ignorance, over how you’re damaging yourself and your family, and over your reluctance to face the truth and reconcile.
This is deeply upsetting for us.
This isn’t just about you.
It’s about what you represent: people claiming Christ, while knowingly or not, causing harm to the Body of Christ, and betraying the trust of Christians who love and serve them.
The Judas Syndrome is a devastating and a destructive toxic element within the Body of Christ.
It leaves people broken, confused, and frightened to love and trust again.
It is a major reason many people are afraid to join a church, or even speak about their faith in public.
They don’t want to be toxically judged, smeared, gossiped and lied about.
We pray for you every day, individually and together, that you would repent, face the facts and grow up.
The more we examine your behaviour and conduct, the more concerned we have become that something genuinely is not right.
Whether that is a mental illness, unresolved trauma, or a psychological complex, we don’t know.
We want you to heal, get the help you need, and change.
While you show no outward signs of remorse, repentance or contrition, we know that you will be feeling the weight of the accountability we are shining on you. We are to that end, grossly embarrassed for you—and for your father David Hacking.
We are obliged to write to him soon, to inform him of the events here and appeal to him as an arbiter.
If not for your sake, for your family’s, and for God’s, we implore you to take responsibility.
Meanwhile, we must correct the record fully and comprehensively, starting with why we had to stop working with and communicating with you.
4. Correcting the Record: Why Lighthouse Ceased Contact with Christian Hacking
Regarding your recent Substack post, you messaged your readership, stating:
“Please let me know what you like or don’t like about these posts. Particular anything you think may be missing in the formulating of my arguments. Having followed the group for 7 months, who cut ties with me after I submitted to them 150 questions (1 of which was answered)“
You have once again manipulated the facts.
You falsely and deceptively imply that we “cut ties” with you because you sent us 150 questions—creating the false implication that we wanted to avoid scrutiny.
We made it very clear to you as to why we were cutting ties with you, which had nothing to do with those questions.
Paul felt a lot of compassion and care for you, due to your vulnerable situation while you were claiming to be a brother in Christ. He had spent hours on recordings trying to reach, connect with and support you. He was always looking for a way to help you for what you could handle. He believed sincerely that you were genuinely trying to help us as a Christian and as a journalist.
Before you sent one question, Paul made it abundantly clear to you on the 26th January 2026 via an audio message, that we could in no way work with you.
We had examined your work and concluded that investigating Lighthouse was a job that you, as an amateur journalist were in no way capable of handling, even if you had the best of intentions, which we began to realise, you did not.
Your reach is extremely limited at around 90 people, with very little engagement.
Despite the onslaught of Establishment-driven attacks on us, we have amassed a far larger reach than that.
To truly have a thorough investigation conducted into Lighthouse, with even a high-calibre journalist would take years.
We have elected to therefore do this job ourselves.
We are placing all the facts with the evidential, provable receipts online for everyone to see. We want everyone to see the reality and the evidence we hold.
We will also be answering questions that actually need answering.
We cannot have someone who is as incompetent as yourself handling such critical work.
For you to think otherwise and then lie about what actually happened, is diabolical and extremely deceptive.
Paul only chose to answer one of your questions, to show you how absurd they were. There was no obligation to answer all of your questions that you dumped on Paul, nor are we obligated to answer any journalist’s questions that would consume us with time we cannot afford!
As events transpired, we found you dishonest, biased, prejudiced, cynical, with major character issues and above all, incompetent. You are only reinforcing our observations in your published lies now.
Mr Hacking, you chose to send those 150 questions to Paul, after he made it abundantly clear, that we could not work with you at all.
You also stated in the same post,
“I suspect their [sic] will be push back (though no door knocks). Your prayers and wisdom is welcome. I want to be honest about my experience but I don’t want to do to them exactly what the BBC did either.”
Knowing what we have been through, especially the three defendants in the court trial, at the mercy of Establishment and BBC attacks, you make a sarcastic and cynical comment about door knocks? After being targeted and attacked by the state, you again reveal yourself as a horribly cynical person claiming Christ.
Please consider the below, one part of our work in showing what is grossly missing in your arguments.
5. Sukh Singh’s Personal Message Explaining Why Lighthouse Were Forced To Cease Contact With Christian Hacking
This is a message sent from Lighthouse Associate Sukh Singh, to you, on the 5th February 2026, just days after he and his fellow Associates, Kris Deichler and Jatinder Kamra, were sentenced at Stratford Magistrate’s Court. Sukh was intending to send you a cease and desist letter already, but wanted to give you one final chance with the benefit of the doubt. Sukh believed earnestly that you would realise, with the truth and facts so clearly laid out, that you ought to stop your irresponsible, destructive behaviour. He believed that surely even an amateur journalist would wake up.
Sukh wanted to believe your story as a Christian, that you would be dedicated to the truth. Tragically and desperately, this was not the case.
So, we are publishing this openly after much deliberation, prayer and consideration because we believe it is this essential to correct the record. To stop your lies and prevent any other amateur, very amateur or professional predatory journalist from spreading lies about any member of the Body of Christ.
Letter from: Sukh Singh
Date 5th February 2026
To: Christian Hacking
Hi Christian,
What I am about to share with you is entirely off the record and not to be published. There are core areas here I ought to have addressed with you this some time ago. But with everything going on regarding the case, fighting for my life, reputation and justice, I’ve had very little psychological air to do so. Given everything that’s happened the last few days, however, despite the fact that I am still figuring out how to keep emotionally, mentally and financially stable now, I feel compelled to write this to you.
If you think that the decision for us not to engage with you journalistically is a sudden decision that came out of the blue, it is not. If you were to look at how you’ve conducted yourself with me, with Paul, with the Lighthouse Associates, you’ll see that actually the opposite is true, and this is long overdue. You know you’ve already had to apologise many times already so far to me and others.
I have always been open with you and told you from early on about the BBC. You spoke very kindly of our own documentary intro with Melissa. You knew me first hand and I told you about the cult accusations. Then nearly a year ago you phoned me up, completely out of the blue having watched A Very British Cult, asking me if I was in a cult. I was very willing to answer any and all your questions about myself, Jeffrey, Paul etc and I patiently took your questions. But what quickly became apparent to me is that firstly, you are very, very easily swayed and convinced by what you see at first glance, and secondly, that you really had no idea what you were looking at. It was clear that you were convinced that Lighthouse is a cult and that Paul Waugh is a nasty cult leader. Nearly a year later you seem quite stuck in that belief based on that one BBC programme. If you remember, I said to you clearly that you’re trying to make a judgment on Lighthouse when you know a) nothing about Lighthouse and b) you don’t know what a cult actually is. While you acknowledged this, it was not until very recently that you actually shared any more on this. Only after my prompting and strong suggestion, did you draft a piece on cults that was riddled with holes, false and misleading statements about Paul and Lighthouse. Imagine if I had not prompted you to do so, what more assumptions and presumptions you would be walking around with to the cost of us and others?
You’ve called yourself an amateur journalist, yet you also believe that you can cast judgment on whether we are a cult or not? You’re not even a proficient, professional journalist, let alone an expert on cults, cult traits, communities, healthy support communities, abusive families, destructive families, or even of business development… I’m literally aghast as I’m writing this Christian, I’m embarrassed that I have to spell this all out to you. You’re in no position to do what you’re doing trying to investigate Lighthouse. I was happy for you to cover the court case. Primarily because, as someone who’s told me they are a Christian and someone who’s defended children murdered in the womb, I felt you would be genuinely open to find out the truth and support another group of vulnerable people attacked in this instance by the BBC and government agencies. (I did not expect you to probe as far as you have so inappropriately, immaturely and inconsiderately). During the trial, while I was under much personal strain, I tried to accommodate you to speak with me on several occasions and for whatever reason, you didn’t arrange anything with me. Though I had to postpone a few occasions, I’ve tried to meet with you to discuss the case to help you cover it factually, trying to meet your urgencies and your self-imposed timeframes at my own expense.
You’ve also been very destructive by association. One of the most damaging and destructive individuals in this situation is Jon Breen. He has doxxed Paul’s children, harassed, verbally abused and tried to destroy us. Though you weren’t to know that, again, without any discernment, you not only bought many of his lies, you then proceeded to project them onto Paul and onto my brothers and sisters in the public gallery at a very vulnerable time for us all. And while you’ve made passing comments to me about how you see his character more clearly, damage has been done by him and consequently you too. If you thought my response was problematic Christian, please, have a look at your conduct first before you throw out such inappropriate labels.
When you have published articles about the case, they’ve contained basic errors. For example, misspelling Lighthouse and my former solicitor’s name as well as other basic details. Even after I shared these corrections with you, you didn’t do anything about them. You’re getting such basic details wrong, despite correction, and you’re trying to get your head around the biggest media deception on a group/organisation? I’m sorry Christian but this isn’t amateur journalism, this is shockingly abysmal. He who is faithful in little is faithful in much, and I cannot be faithful in the major issues if you get it so wrong on the minor issues. My mistake has been giving you too much room and inappropriately giving you the expectation that you would do a good job here. I did not confront these violations. I was so consumed with the case and thought you to be a supportive brother in Christ, because that’s what you presented. From the moment you started looking into us, you’ve made mistake after blunder and made this all the more harder for us.
On the day of the verdict, you proceeded to almost immediately ask me questions about Associate fees, investments etc. At the time, frankly I was so bamboozled by the whole process, I went along with it and answered as best I could. But Christian, that was just so inappropriate of you to ask anything like that at the time, let alone such an unrelated question! Where was your head at? Clearly on your story, not on the human reality of my and our situation. Looking back, it certainly shows me that your interest and focus was in your story, not in me or us.
Adding to this fact, bizarrely and frankly quite disturbingly, you asked Paul – not me – about the psychosexual abuse from my mother… Do you know how inhuman that is? That would be like me going to someone at CBRUK and asking them about how you ended up in a wheelchair – except far worse! It would be more akin to you having been raped and beaten to near-death to end up in a wheelchair and then me asking [NAME REDACTED] about the details of your rape and abuse! To add insult to injury, before the sentence had been given, you wanted me to put you in touch with my brother who clearly I am estranged from by the mere fact he’s not even at the trial, amongst other things. Christian… where is your empathy? Your compassion? Your human decency?! Even your social etiquette at the least? I know atheists who have more social grace and consideration than what you’ve shown. I’m saying all of this Christian in the desperate hope you wake up!
Again, while you may say you are my brother, you say you’re praying for us and you want to grab a meal with me, the way you act and treat us all, is like we’re an impersonal story to you. That’s what the BBC did to us, treat us like objects for their story. We were pieces of meat they could throw to the animals to please the crowds baying for blood in the Colosseum. All you have to do is look on X.com to see the vipers coming out again for myself, Kris and Jatinder. Are you aware of what you’re doing here? Is this how you treat other Christians? You said yourself there’s something here amongst the Associates that you’re missing, you know you feel something deep down and that is where I have compassion for you Christian. What are you missing? What’s causing you to behave this way without recognition of it? I didn’t want to believe this, but your behaviour in the last few months tells me that we are primarily a story to you. Whatever that story is. You claim you come first as a Christian and then as a journalist, but you behave as a tabloid journalist with seemingly very little demonstrable Christian heart. If you really believed you were an amateur journalist, you wouldn’t be jumping to all these conclusions that you have every step of the way. You said to me you did not want Paul to mentor you but evidently, even if just in your journalistic ventures, you need mentoring. You want to embark on one of the world’s biggest investigations, where angels fear to tread, where no other press outlet aside from the Mail and BBC have touched us… as a self-proclaimed amateur journalist?!
Speaking of Paul, I’m not sure if you are aware of this, but you seem to have very little if any concern for Paul. Why? Probably because the BBC have done their work on you – maybe you really believe he is a cult leader. You’re not being tentative with him from an impartial place, you’re treating him as guilty until proven innocent… just as the BBC do and want you to. In fact I’d really ask you to examine your own questions. You’re painting Paul as a self-proclaimed Messiah, as if we worship him and his word above the Word of God?! Where do you get such outlandish, absurd questions from?! Did you see Melissa, Kris, Jatinder or I reading from “the book of Paul” during our court case when we were stressed out of our minds at near exhaustion? No, we had our Bibles with us! Forgive my indignation but wow, you question whether we’re a cult? I have every right to question whether you’re a journalist? And if so, did you take the BBC’s training course on investigations?
I don’t know if anyone’s told you this in other instances, but in the name of wanting to help and do a story, you’ve caused a lot of harm here. And you’ve had the gall to look at us sceptically to ask (and not honestly answer), are we the cult? I’m not writing this to condemn you, as you have seemingly condemned Paul before knowing the facts yourself. I’m writing this because I hope it will open your eyes to what you’ve been doing here; the chaotic, haphazard and inconsiderate manner with which you’ve conducted yourself. If you weren’t a follower of our Lord, I wouldn’t have opened the opportunity to you, nor would Paul. Nor would I have taken the time out of my day to write this to you. I’m doing so because I hope and pray The Holy Spirit will help you see whatever you need to see and repent.
As you know this is going to the Crown Court, so I would strongly encourage you to watch that case as it unfolds and take the time to find out all the facts. Do your research with the BBC and Catrin Nye. You say you’ve sent hard questions to the BBC…do you really think they’ll come back to you? How hard are you willing to pursue the truth? How many attempts are you willing to make to get your questions answered? They ignored, censored, gaslit and put us in court for trying to get our questions answered and justice served. As Paul has mentioned to you, we’re going to be posting questions and answers on our sites to address major issues concerning Lighthouse, Paul, the BBC and more. If you’re willing to keep updated, you’ll find out more facts there.
I think it’s best you give this at least a year to watch things unfold. I’d ask you to please not approach anyone at Lighthouse regarding any journalistic enquiries to avoid you doing any further damage. At least until the Crown Court trial has concluded. Hopefully we can come together one day at a later date after this year, and teach others and help them not make the same mistakes, so that God would be glorified through it.
I’ll leave you with one thought… over 20 years ago, Tommy Robinson was vilified across the board by the mainstream media, by churches and the British public. As he said himself which you reported on, he was shunned and put off by many Christians and churches. I was guilty of seeing him as a racist and violent man. He is now seen as a voice for the people. But looking back, there were so few, almost no one who was willing to seek out the truth and get to the root of who he really was and is. The same is happening here with Lighthouse. Many have jumped on the bandwagon of Lighthouse being a cult and Paul Waugh the supposed cult leader. We are all so extremely duped by Satan’s machinery. This is why I believe our Lord warned us so strongly to not be deceived. As Paul said to you, there are so few true champions of the brotherhood out there. We need them, they need them. I encourage you to become one.
To finish, I want to address something regarding publishing about Lighthouse. As I’ve said, you’re free to publish whatever you want to. But if you show the same carelessness, inconsideration and recklessness in what you publish as you have done so far, then I and we will have to correct that and publicly hold you accountable to those wrongs. None of us can afford to have another set of falsehoods from any sort of journalist just put out in the public without the proper and impartial due diligence. That goes for anyone in the Body, not just Lighthouse.
God bless and be with you Christian. You and your family are in all of our prayers – all of us at Lighthouse.
6. The Cease and Desist Letter Sent To Christian Hacking
After realising this step was critically needed, on the 5th February 2026, Sukh Singh issued a cease and desist letter to you via Whatsapp, email and recorded delivery.
From: Sukh Singh
Date 5th February 2026
To: Christian Hacking
Christian,
I am writing to formally demand with immediate effect, that you cease and desist all communication to myself, any Lighthouse Associate, our legal team [NAMES REDACTED] or any individual at [ORGANISATION REDACTED] related directly to this case of Rex vs Deichler, Kamra, Singh.
I am under strict guidance from my legal team to not engage with any media, be they independent or mainstream. This is because my court case is still live by way of appeal. Any communications with the media about this case, Lighthouse or any events, individuals and situations related to it, could severely jeopardise the entire appeal itself, resulting in a breach of court restrictions and possible custodial sentence.
If you do not respect and abide by this cease and desist, our solicitors will take legal action against you.
I have also emailed you this cease and desist. If there is an alternative postal address I ought to send this to, please inform me of the correct address. There will be no use of your postal address aside from delivering this cease and desist.
Regards,
Sukh Singh
7. In Closing
Mr Hacking, publishing all of this fills us with grief and sadness.
Just like with the BBC (and everyone else who has tried to spread falsehoods about Lighthouse Global), we tried to reconcile and address these attacks privately—hoping the parties trying to destroy us would take responsibility.
Because that has not happened, we are forced to hold you publicly accountable. We have done this and continue to do this through deep prayer, consideration and responsibility. Regardless of your response, or as it seems, your non-response, if you or your family are ever in a dire or desperate situation and we can help you in a time of need, we will, as is our duty to all our neighbours, all those who attack us. This is our duty to ourselves and to Christ.
In the coming days, we will write directly to your father, David Hacking, and include further examples of recordings that Paul S Waugh shared with you, which you have deliberately chosen to ignore and reject.
May God help you, Mr Hacking. You and your family are in our prayers. While we no longer expect the same from you towards us, we will love you in truth—backed by provable receipts.
Yours in Christ,
The Lighthouse Global community
Related articles:
Open Letter Part II to Amateur Journalist Christian Hacking — False Allegiance to Christ or the Establishment? 
30th April, 2026 – Lighthouse Thursday Update – The Real Reason Why Lighthouse Global Stopped Working With Amateur Journalist Christian Hacking 
Lighthouse Weekly Update – Nov 2 2025 – Legal Developments and Judicial Accountability 
Mr Davie, we demand the resignation of Catrin Nye, Jamie Bartlett, Ravin Sampat and Natalie Truswell
We have repeatedly demonstrated the opportunity we extended to Mr Hacking, yet he continues to reveal his true motives behind his so-called journalistic endeavours in reporting on the case involving the three guys.
It is now clear that this was never about genuine Christian brotherly support. Whether Mr Hacking is unwell and in need of help, I pray that he receives the assistance he needs, turns to Christ, and makes right what he has seriously got wrong.
May God be with us all.
It’s deeply saddening to read this letter and know that this is necessary. The expressions here of how much we wish this wasn’t necessary, how unpleasant it is to go through and how much time and energy this is taking people to write and put them together are genuine and real. Yet the more that comes out about this and the more the facts are put on the table the more it explains why this is so necessary and what is behind and has driven Mr Hacking to do this. Just weigh up the responsibility taken on both sides, the sentiments expressed on both sides of this, the intentions of both sides here, the desired outcomes of both sides and ask yourself, the reader, which is most in line with Christ’s commandments and biblical principles and which isn’t. For me it’s quite plainly obvious and stark the difference between the two.
Yes this is ugly business and horrible to have to go through on all sides, but it was also completely avoidable on Mr Hacking’s part. Again and again, as we look back through at what’s happened, we can see the lack of compassion, lack of empathy, lack of care and brotherly support, and a lot of cynicism and focus on personal agendas. It grieves me and it grieves us all, but as this letter says, we have a duty to fulfil here, not just to ourselves, but for all Christians. This is so much bigger than this situation alone in what it represents. Mr Hacking and his family are in my prayers to receive God’s help from this soon and for him to make things right.
Well expressed brother thank you
Sharing these messages now is something I never thought I and we would need to do. I am still processing a lot of how someone in the name of Christ will butcher and abuse the facts, for their own idea of themselves. It’s actually ghastly and deeply disturbing. It was all made very, very clear to Mr Hacking. Paul made it totally clear to him. He gave him so much time, care and attention and Mr Hacking abused that love. I don’t know what issues he has, but I hope and I pray that they’re healed / resolved. This is exposing his dark character for what it is. Whatever justifications he may use, the evidence is here for all to see. We have all the receipts and Christian Hacking knows it. He on the other hand, has his woke opinion and his ability to badly manipulate and twist the facts. God help him to come right.
So far, Mr Hacking’s account feels selectively framed in a way that casts us as the aggressor, when in reality we’ve been responding to claims made about us from the outset. That context matters, and leaving it out gives a misleading impression of how this situation actually began.
The suggestion that we cut ties because of the questions he posed simply doesn’t reflect what actually happened. It’s not just inaccurate—it risks coming across as a deliberate distortion of events rather than a fair summary. If the goal is clarity, that point needs to be addressed honestly.
I also find it disappointing that someone who professes to follow Christ would avoid a straightforward, good-faith discussion. If we’re wrong, we’re open to being shown where and to making it right—but that requires engagement, not assertions made at a distance.
At the moment, it feels less like an effort to reach the truth and more like an attempt to make claims without subjecting them to scrutiny. We’re still willing to have that conversation, but it has to be a genuine exchange, not a one-sided narrative.
This really is such a tragic situation we find ourselves in. As is shown, Christian Hacking was warned with a very straight and candid message along with a cease and desist letter. When hearing that it was because of his questions that communication was halted, that just proved Christian Hacking’s character and his selective perception of reality.
Now he’s dragged his family into this process of accountability holding. After seeing the way that we are prepared to go to the wall to stand for truth, did he somehow think he could abuse and betray our trust?
I’ve come to expect such behaviour from the likes of the BBC and the Daily Mail, but it’s a whole new level to have it from someone who professed to be a brother in Christ informing us that he was coming to our aid.
This is a much needed letter Mr Hacking so that the Body can understand what actually happened and for him to understand the reality too because of the depth of denial. There is a different perspective once the evidence is brought to the front and that perspective is one of truth and reality. There is a lot of struggle and pain that we are all going through, trying to protect Mr Hacking from himself and the pain we have gone through as part of revealing the truth and I appreciate the process of doing this. I pray that Mr Hacking repents and this situation is reconciled. God bless you all and Mr Hacking 🙏
Mr Hacking’s militant ignorance and lack of Christian love and heart, is truly disturbing to see especially after the many times he was given opportunities to make the right decision.
It is a display of real selfishness to have brought unnecessary load to his family through making these ill-advised steps against us but most of all, to betray those within the household of faith.
We can only continue to pray that at some point, Mr Hacking will take these open letters seriously and take a long and honest look at his own heart. God has told us that no weapon formed against His servants will prosper so I pray that Mr Hacking will see that his efforts have been futile and unnecessary.
This third open letter to Christian Hacking makes it clear how painful it has been to come to terms with Mr Hacking’s betrayal. After all that was given to him at Lighthouse, particularly by Paul and Sukh, his decision to publish falsehoods reveals a deeply troubling pattern of conduct and speaks clearly about his character.
What he has done is not consistent with Christian faith or Christian principles. I pray that he comes to recognise the seriousness of his actions, acknowledges his wrongdoing, and seeks genuine repentance. Accountability is essential, both for justice and for the restoration that can only begin with truth.
Wow, thank you for sharing this letter. Once again, it is showing me the love that you have for Mr Hacking, as a claimed brother in Christ, yet feeling the bitterness of betrayal. God bless Sukh for taking the time to write to him, to express his concerns for him, as well as how Paul has also expressed concerns, yet Mr Hacking continues to spread falsehoods through his amateur journalism. I pray for Mr Hacking and his family because of the damage he is causing not only to Lighthouse, but to his own family as well.
It is shocking that someone who claims to be Christian can treat fellow brothers in the way that he has, especially during a most stressful time for the 3 in court. How he treated Paul, a man who is still recovering from illness, yet he took the time to send recordings to Mr Hacking, but treated Paul with so much disrespect.
We, as Christians, need to be educated about the Judas Syndrome, which is a very serious and real issue, so that we can and will be prepared for the attacks that will come from within the Body of Christ. God bless us all…Amen
Phew, when you look at what has gone down, I can see the rationale for cutting contact. You had a menace on your hands. Trust is critical in human and business dealings, and once that self serving nature was apparent, that he was not a benefit but increasingly a detriment, not only to Lighthouse, but to the wider Body of Christ, then something definite had to happen, and had to be done.
Thank you for laying out the facts. God speed your journey.
I am commanded to ‘love your neighbour’ and to ‘love your enemy’. It appears in this case Mr Hacking appeared as a neighbour but has behaved as an enemy, either on purpose or by accident. I pray for him regardless.