26th Jan, 2026 – Lighthouse Monday Update – Opening Our Eyes to Truth

Lighthouse Daily – 26th January 2026..

By Paul S. Waugh

In the following update, you will find:

1. Today’s Update
2. Daily Prayer – A Prayer Cherishing God Opening Our Eyes 
3. Today’s Daily “Citizen/Christian and The Establishment Problem” Example – Firefighter And Judiciary Describes Orwellian Police Behaviour
4. Lighthouse Associates Consensus Feedback

1. Today’s Update

Good day everyone,

We’re currently hard at work on the publication of The Lighthouse Magazine. The distinctions we have made through our more than two decades of research are astonishing and we are so grateful to God that we are now able to share them with you all. 

The vicious attacks on us have only brought us closer to our Lord and have helped us to go even deeper with our research. The Lighthouse provides much needed illumination at a time when it is so desperately needed. 

Because of our work on The Lighthouse there won’t be much in the way of updates today. 

Our focus is on completing the first inaugural issue, which we’re genuinely excited to share with you. We’ll be revealing the cover in the coming days.

Thank you for your prayers, and continued support. 

God bless you all. 

Paul S. Waugh, Chris Nash, Shaun Cooper

2. Daily Prayer

Today’s Daily Prayer focuses on cherishing God and asking Him to open our eyes to His presence, truth, and work in our lives. It invites us to see beyond surface appearances, embrace spiritual clarity, and treasure God’s guidance amid challenge and confusion. May this prayer deepen your vision, align your heart with God’s purposes, and strengthen your capacity to recognise His hand in every season.

👉 Paul S. Waugh’s Daily Prayer – A Prayer Cherishing God Opening Our Eyes

3. Today’s Daily “Citizen/Christian and the Establishment Problem” Example

Firefighter And Judiciary Describes Orwellian Police Behaviour

This story of Robert Moss shows how easily the machinery of criminal law can be turned on an ordinary citizen for speech that amounts to criticism, not violence. It shows a direct contrast to how a free society must be based on evidence, proportion, and clear legal thresholds rather than suspicion and hostility to the political views of a citizen.

Mr Moss is not a political agitator with a desire to destroy political opponents. He is a former firefighter with nearly three decades of service, whose dismissal from his role was later ruled unfair by an employment tribunal. After that ruling, he continued to discuss his treatment and the fire service in a private Facebook group where he had long offered professional advice. For this, his home was raided at dawn, he was arrested, processed like a serious criminal, and had his electronic devices seized.

Crucially, there was not even a charge or any evidence to base one upon. Yet the punishment had already happened. The arrest, the seizure of property, the stress, the reputational damage, and the chilling effect on speech are all real and irreversible, even if the case ultimately collapses. This is yet another example of how “the process is the punishment” that we described here.

It is important to be fair. No serious person is arguing that free speech should mean the right to threaten violence, harass individuals, or incite harm. The law already draws those lines, and rightly so. But this case sits nowhere near them. Criticising an institution, discussing one’s own mistreatment, or questioning the actions of public bodies is not incitement. It is a basic democratic function. Treating such speech as criminal, without clear evidence, stretches police powers beyond their proper limits.

What exacerbates this case is that even the Magistrates Courts had to overturn a gagging clause imposed at Moss’s bail hearing which meant that Mr Moss couldn’t even disclose he had been arrested. In fact the Judge openly warned that officers appeared to be acting as though they lived in a police state. That is not rhetoric from activists or commentators. It is language used by the judiciary itself, signalling that something has gone badly wrong.

When police can arrest first, search first, seize first, and justify later, all on the basis of speech that offends or irritates, the balance between citizen and state shifts decisively. Even if no conviction ever follows, the message is clear: criticise too loudly, and you will pay a heavy price that will cost you more than just money. It will aim to destroy you mentally, physically, emotionally and spiritually. This is why cases like this matter beyond the individual involved. They set precedents in practice, if not yet in law. A society that reaches that point has not lost free speech in theory, but in reality. 

4. Lighthouse Associates Consensus Feedback

The following is an excerpt from feedback that was shared with Paul by Lighthouse associates following a call with them yesterday.

As we reflect together on what has been shared over these last days, we find ourselves grappling with a deeper and more unsettling clarity about what we are actually facing, both personally and collectively, and we recognise that this clarity has not come cheaply but through pain, resistance, repentance, and a growing willingness to look at realities we have spent much of our lives either minimising, mistaking, or avoiding altogether.

What Paulie has pressed into so firmly has shifted something fundamental for us: that what we and so many others have endured is not a matter of harshness, mismanagement, or even abuse watered-down through institutional language, but something far more destructive in its consequences. Where systems, processes, and sustained coercion strip people of life, dignity, conscience, and future without ever needing to physically lay hands on them. Naming this accurately as institutional murder matters. This is not for effect, but because the softened, sanitised language we have used has protected perpetrators, confused victims, and kept us from fully grasping the scale and seriousness of what has been done to us, to children, and to the most vulnerable.

At the same time, we are increasingly aware that this did not begin “out there” with the BBC, the courts, or the state, but far earlier and far closer to home, in families, schools, and social structures that trained us to normalise control, suppress truth, outsource conscience, and equate love with compliance. Many of us are only now beginning to see how deeply these patterns were installed in us, how they shaped our understanding of suffering, responsibility, obedience, and even God Himself.  We’re seeing how readily we carried those distortions forward into adulthood, relationships, and our work.

There has been a shared reckoning here with our own limitations, blind spots, and failures of empathy. This is particularly where survival replaced formation and where unprocessed fear and neglect were redirected outward rather than faced honestly within. For some of us, that has meant acknowledging how we contributed to harm, misunderstanding, or misjudgment, not only in specific pieces of work but in posture, tone, and relationship, and recognising that making things right with one another cannot be separated from making things right with God. Repentance, as we are learning, is not performative or sentimental, but demanding, ongoing, and costly.

Again and again, the image of limited perspective has helped us articulate this, whether through the goldfish bowl, the family system, or the vastness of a culture that disguises domination through scale, familiarity, and habit. We are beginning to understand how indoctrination works not through overt force but through repetition, fragmentation, isolation, and the slow erosion of truth, and how easily good people become participants in this when they have never been equipped to recognise it. This has sharpened our awareness of why so many Christians struggle to discern what is happening, and why education grounded in truth, reality, and lived experience is not optional but essential.

We are also deeply conscious of the cost Paulie continues to bear in leading this work, particularly in light of his health, and we do not take lightly the consistency, care, and perseverance he brings, even when misunderstood, resisted, or attacked. It is increasingly clear to us that Lighthouse exists precisely because this kind of clarity is rare, hard-won, and threatening to systems that depend on confusion and compliance. If this work were silenced, the loss would not be abstract but borne by countless people who would never receive the understanding they need to break free, heal, and choose differently.

We hold gratitude, grief, repentance, and resolve together in this moment, aware of how much further there is to go, yet increasingly certain that this path, however demanding, is the one we are called to walk. We commit to continuing this work with humility, courage, and care for one another, trusting that God is at work even here, drawing us closer to truth, to freedom, and to Himself.

God bless us all x x 

Related articles:

Lighthouse Daily Update – 6 Oct 2025 – Lighthouse Daily Update Dec 2, 2025 – Lighthouse Tuesday Update – Diabolical Pride and the Problem of Separateness By Paul S. Waugh Dec 4, 2025 – Lighthouse Thursday Update – Returning to the One True God Dec 7, 2025 – Lighthouse Sunday Update – Walking in the Spirit – The God Awareness Phenomenon